![]() |
Fox Searchlight Pictures |
Watching a Wes Anderson
film is like visiting a strange land. It is like opening a fairy tale book. I
imagine it is comparable to stepping in to Wonderland. So feasting my eyes on
Anderson’s latest creation, The Grand Budapest Hotel, a film inspired by
the writings of Stefan Zweig, is something that I have looked forward to for
some time and now that I have seen it, I must say, it is great to be back in
his world. The Grand Budapest Hotel
is fully Anderson and then some. Anderson signatures such as quirky pacing, set
designs, dialogue and characters, one of which worthy of being declared his
greatest yet, pleasantly occupy The Grand
Budapest Hotel.
The
Grand Budapest Hotel begins in present day with a young
woman walking up to the monument of “The Author” as she reads his memoirs. Immediately
after, the audience is taken to the 1980’s where we find The Author (Tom
Wilkinson), as his son pesters him, sitting in front of a camera, speaking
about his visit to the Grand Budapest Hotel. The setting then becomes 1968 when
The Author (Jude Law), visited the Grand Budapest and sat down for dinner with its
legendary owner Zero Moustafa (F. Murray Abraham). It is here that Zero goes on
to share with The Author about when he started working at the hotel as a lobby
boy under the supervision of concierge Monsieur Gustave H. (Ralph Fiennes). This
causes for film setting to switch to 1932 where the adventures of Zero (Tony
Revolori) and Gustave come to life. The issue at hand in the older Zero’s story
is the mysterious death of Madame D. (a unrecognizable Tilda Swinton), one of
the wealthiest guest of the hotel and a dear friend of Gustave’s. Following her
death, at the reading of her will, it comes to light that she has left an extremely
valuable painting titled ‘Boy with Apple’ to Gustave. Of course this angers her
five children which causes for Gustave and Zero to take the painting from
Madame D. home before they can keep him from getting it.
It is no secret that
Anderson has called on particular players often in his career but The Grand Budapest Hotel is one big
alumni event, as it seems that everyone that has participated before comes out
for this one. Small appearances from Anderson faithful’s such as Bill Murray,
Owen Wilson and Jason Schwartzman are scattered throughout the film. In a
slightly more memorable role is Harvey Keitel as a wise prisoner named Ludwig,
who is very well written for small amount of lines he is given. Adrian Brody is
highly entertaining with the free range he is given and his brother in the
film, Willem Dafoe, always taking on the quirkiest of Anderson’s characters, is
also memorable.
It is the new comers
though that are the focus. Tony Revolori as Zero is a solid compliment to
Fiennes. Zero is a very familiar character. Anderson often creates characters
that have a certain subtlety to them. These characters are not particularly
flashy in anyway but you can’t help but listen when they speak or act because
they have so much to do with the effectiveness of the plot and other
characters. Zero is that character in The
Grand Budapest Hotel so Revolori’s reserved but confident approach is spot
on. Like I said though, Revolori and the character are a compliment to another
character.
That character is
Gustave and boy, what a character he is. Whether it be him referring to nearly
everyone as ‘darling’, his relationships with older blonde women or his
interest in poetry, Gustave mesmerizes with ease. His antics as concierge of
the hotel cause for him to be one the most memorable characters that have come
from Anderson. This is saying a lot considering the how great nearly every
character of his is. Of course though,
with every memorable character is a memorable performance and Ralph Fiennes’s
is no exception. Fiennes in the role makes sense especially when considering
how wildly entertaining he was as Harry in In
Bruges and how his quirkiness in that film is exactly what is needed for
Gustave. I can say now, after seeing Fiennes in the role, I don’t believe there
would be better choice.
Like any Anderson
adventure though, the real star of the show is Anderson himself. It is only
fitting that his latest film takes place in an extravagant, oddly located hotel
due to the way that watching an Anderson film is like entering a place that is
nothing less than strange but at the same time offers so much to discover and
enjoy. A lot of this can be contributed to how many, if not all aspects of his
films have quirky foundations that cause for them to support each other so
well. Maybe the most bizarre element of them all is the backdrop for everything
that is happening, the set design. The
Grand Budapest Hotel’s set design, a character in its self, stands out in a
strange way as it offers little light with its dark shades due to its heavy use
of warm colors including Gustuve as he is always seen in a royal-like color.
It is the unique pacing
along with its use of dialogue that sets an Anderson film apart from others. It
is a slow developing sort of progression but at the same time has an urgent
feel to it. There is never a lot of flashy movement or emotions but instead the
dialogue is given the driver’s seat as it moves everything forward and keeps
things so entertaining. I guess the best way to describe all of this is as
Anderson’s style. It is a style that has become expected in a film of his. It
is also a style that is thick in The
Grand Budapest Hotel. The Grand
Budapest Hotel verifies that Anderson, as a filmmaker, has not only fully embraced
this style but has ensured himself that his style is his and why not stick with
it. In doing so the audience cannot help but feel the same way and will willingly
return to The Grand Budapest Hotel
for years to come as well as look forward to any adventure from Anderson.
Grade:
A-
No comments:
Post a Comment